Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Founded in 1979, Solar Oregon is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit membership organization providing public education and community outreach to encourage Oregonians to choose solar energy.
You are here: Home News "Why All The Flak Over Oregon's Big Green Success?"

"Why All The Flak Over Oregon's Big Green Success?"

positive BETC analysis in SNL Financial

"Why All The Flak Over Oregon's Big Green Success?"

Randy L. Rasmussen, The Oregonian

Award-winning energy reporter Lisa Cohn - a regular SNL Financial columnist -  published a powerful article in defense of Oregon's clean energy financing programs, including the Business Energy Tax Credit (BETC).  These programs have played an integral role in the growth and success of Oregon's solar manufacturing and distributed generation initiatives. Cohn provides under-publicized information about Oregon's returns on investing in clean energy as an economic development strategy, and contrasts data about Oregon's leading clean energy economy with an adverse media trend that occurred amid the context of world energy crises.
Erin Greeson
Communications Manager
Renewable Northwest Project

"Why All The Flak Over Oregon's Big Green Success?"

by Lisa Cohn
SNL Financial Blog: Cohn's Corner

>> Click here to view original article


It's hard to understand all the flak over Oregon's green tax incentives, which have been a whopping success and positioned the state as a leader in renewable energy.

The Oregonian newspaper in Portland ran a three-part series in mid-March criticizing Oregon's business energy tax credit, saying it is unclear how many jobs the incentive has created. Meanwhile, a state legislative tax credit committee is asking questions about the credit.

What's most puzzling is the fact that one of the stories ran on the front page, just above an article about Japan's nuclear plant crisis. Doesn't a crisis such as Japan's point to the need for more renewable energy tax credit money, not less?

Oregon's Business Energy Tax Credit provides a 50% credit for the eligible costs of a qualifying renewable resource project, according to the Oregon Department of Energy.

In 2007, when the economy was still in good shape, the Legislature increased the size of the BETC to 50% from 33%. At the same time, the state implemented a renewable portfolio standard that requires the state's largest investor-owned utilities to ensure that 25% of their electricity supply comes from renewable energy by 2025. Some of the questions about the BETC have come since the economic downturn. Critics say too much money is being poured into renewable energy when it could be going toward "essential" services.

Last year, in response to concerns that too much taxpayer money was being funneled into this popular program, the Legislature fine-tuned the credit, capping the state's exposure, reducing the total award amount and putting a sunset on the program, said John Audley, deputy director of the Portland, Ore.-based Renewable Northwest Project, which promotes the development of renewable resources. That should have calmed the naysayers. But no, they're still targeting the BETC.

Interestingly, critics say the BETC is a waste of public money because so much of the power created from the plants goes to California. Would critics complain if an incentive helped local timber companies sell their timber out of state? This argument doesn't make sense at all.

Here are just some of the benefits of Oregon's BETC:

* The BETC cost the state $244 million in 2007 and in the first three quarters of 2008, according to a study commissioned by the Oregon Department of Energy. "It generated a net economic impact of $576 million, created 1,700 new jobs worth $42 million in wages, and generated $22 million in new state and local tax revenues," the RNP said.
* Between January 2005 and January 2011, $614 million in BETC credits was matched by $2.7 billion in private investment, leading to $3.3 billion in projects, according to the RNP.
* In 2009, the cumulative energy savings and renewable energy generation associated with the BETC totaled 72 trillion Btu, enough energy to power 175,000 homes, the RNP said.
* In 2007, Oregon was tops in the nation in terms of clean energy jobs per capita, according to "The Clean Energy Economy" by the Pew Charitable Trusts.

The projects that receive BETC funding are a big boost to the economy of the small towns where they are. Sherman County, Ore., which is home to six of the nine wind farms that received BETC funding, has received more than $17 million since 2002 in property taxes, fees and other investments. The county's annual revenues have jumped from about $300,000 in 2002 to $10 million in 2010.

What's more, Oregon's green tax incentives have attracted some of the largest "green" manufacturers in the world, including Vestas Americas, SolarWorld, Clear Edge, Sanyo Solar and Iberdrola Renewables Inc.

The list of benefits goes on. Then there's the most obvious advantage: The projects and manufacturers that receive the BETC are producing clean, emission-free energy: They yield no carbon emissions, spill no oil into our nation's waterways and produce no nuclear waste.

Given these benefits, the criticism is indeed puzzling. How will we ever avoid costly oil spills, nuclear plant disasters and global warming when people funnel so much energy into fighting job-producing, economy-boosting, green programs like the BETC?






Personal tools
powered by Plone | site by Groundwire Consulting and served with clean energy